Home › AdGuard VPN vs PrivadoVPN

AdGuard VPN vs PrivadoVPN: Which Should You Choose in 2026?

A side-by-side on price, jurisdiction, audits and devices – grounded in AdGuard VPN's own site and 187 real reviews.

AdGuard VPNPrivadoVPN
Price$2.99–$11.99/mo$1.11–$10.99/mo
Simultaneous devices10 (2 on the free plan)10
Free plan3GB/month, 2 devices10GB/30 days, 1 device
Servers / locations75+ locations / ~60 countries236 locations / 66 cities
JurisdictionCyprus (EU member state)Switzerland
Independent auditNo published independent no-logs audit foundNo published independent audit found

Pricing

PrivadoVPN starts as low as $1.11/mo on its 24-month plan, undercutting AdGuard VPN's cheapest tier, with a comparable free plan (10GB/30 days vs. AdGuard's 3GB/month).

Features, jurisdiction & audits

Both are self-reported no-logs services headquartered in privacy-favorable jurisdictions (PrivadoVPN in Switzerland, AdGuard VPN in Cyprus) with no independent audit published by either. AdGuard VPN's differentiator is its ad/tracker-blocking heritage; PrivadoVPN's is a larger claimed server footprint.

Which should you choose?

This is the closest head-to-head on price and audit status. If ad/tracker blocking as a privacy layer matters to you specifically, AdGuard VPN's heritage gives it an edge; if raw price and free-tier data matter more, PrivadoVPN is cheaper.

What AdGuard VPN's own reviewers say

Reliability in Usage

Some users report a reliable experience with the VPN, especially in terms of maintaining privacy during browsing.

Inconsistent Performance

Users report variability in performance, with some experiencing poor speeds and connectivity problems that undermine the VPN's reliability.

These are patterns from our analysis of all 187 AdGuard VPN reviews, not PrivadoVPN-specific complaints – useful context on what you'd actually be trading for AdGuard's ad-blocking heritage and price.

Try AdGuard VPN

Measured head-to-head: AdGuard VPN vs PrivadoVPN

Our own captures for AdGuard VPN and PrivadoVPN, side by side, with every gap and every limit.

MeasuredAdGuard VPNPrivadoVPN
Baseline download (VPN off)295 Mbps294 Mbps
Nearest Europe: serverMarseilleLondon
Nearest Europe: download136 Mbps (46%)200 Mbps (68%)
Nearest Europe: upload180 Mbps102 Mbps
Nearest Europe: ping46 ms42 ms
Long-distance US: download200 Mbps (68%)160 Mbps (54%)
Long-distance US: ping171 ms132 ms
DNS leak test captured captured
WebRTC leak test captured captured
BBC iPlayer captured captured
Netflixnot captured captured

Takeaway: on the Europe route AdGuard VPN kept 46% of its baseline against 68% for PrivadoVPN (a gap of 22 points); on the US route 68% against 54%. The gap is large enough to be worth noting, though it is still one run per route.

Same line and machine with a fresh baseline for each VPN. Server country and protocol can differ; one run per route.

All AdGuard VPN captures →

Questions people ask

Short answers, based on our own captures and the data on this site.

Which is faster, AdGuard VPN or PrivadoVPN?

On the nearest-European route AdGuard VPN delivered 136 Mbps against PrivadoVPN's 200 Mbps (46% vs 68% of each baseline); on the US route 200 vs 160 Mbps. One run each, so treat small gaps as noise.

Is AdGuard VPN or PrivadoVPN better for streaming?

We captured AdGuard VPN playing BBC iPlayer. For PrivadoVPN we captured BBC iPlayer, Netflix. Missing results mean not captured, not failed.

Were both tested under the same conditions?

Same line and machine with a fresh baseline for each, but the server country and protocol can differ; the table lists them.

Where can I see the raw captures?

The screenshots and recordings for AdGuard VPN are on its tests pages. We publish captures only for the VPN each site is about.